Its just Hard

so she literally wrecked your life, and then ditched you, claiming you were “needy,” after causing your increased neediness through her own negligence.

This type of thing seems rather common.

Maybe you could sue her?

I don’t think it’s legally viable to claim she “made you” attempt suicide. But i do think you might have some grounds for “pain and suffering,” and the right lawyer might be able to string it all together just right… but i wouldn’t count on it.

The OP, however, i think, has a much more viable claim, due to the fact that it was literally her negligent actions which caused him direct and serious harm, which she then exacerbated, by blaming the very same problems she negligently caused, for her choice to impose further unwanted distress upon “her victim.”

He might have a case. I would suggest looking into finding an advocate.

Ultimately, that’s the chance you take, and the risk you assume, when piloting a vehicle and transporting passengers: you are liable for their damages, if you are at fault in an accident. Running a stop sign places you squarely at fault, and in so doing, you are liable for any ensuing damages. However, they could say that “insurance has already covered this liability sufficiently,” in which case you’d probably have no grounds to file suit… unless of course the insurance isn’t covering your damages. And then there’s the possibility that she was driving Your car, with you as a passenger… and i guess that means it’s your own insurance covering you, because you authorized the person at fault, to operate your vehicle. Idk, i’m not a lawyer, and it feels murky at this point… but i’m guessing there’s probably a way you could still sue her, if you really wanted to. It’s not going to bring her back or change what happened, but at least she’d know she hurt you enough that you felt the need to press the issue, regardless of the outcome. That might be the best you can do.

“…there is nothing for me to draw on.”

So your desire for a man is actually born of parasitic intent.

Good to know.

Adding to previous comment:

The point of “equality,” is not to endorse the same unfair and inappropriate behavior you claim men are doing; it is instead for everyone to treat everyone fairly.

From what i’ve seen, fair treatment of others is not a gender issue, even though it’s often confused and misrepresented as such. Unfairness and Injustice wear many labels.

well… at least you can admit it, here.

I agree, realistically, life sucks for most of us, and those of us who can’t change it, tend to be disregarded by those who are capable of latching onto someone “better.”

However, it is obvious, to me, that a much larger percentage of women successfully accomplish that, because they have a type of privilege most men are never afforded. In my eyes, this means we are not exactly “equal,” because most men can’t just latch onto some woman and be taken care of just for being willing to participate in her life. To deny the significance of that advantageous privilege is disingenuous at best, if not entirely delusional. Unlucky guys who “aren’t good enough,” or lack surplus assets, tend to get treated quite terribly and “used” by women who know they can just latch onto someone else, rather than having to actually support themselves… and then they derogate the guys who can’t support themselves, who have no option of just latching onto someone and being taken care of. There are many hypocritical and “vile” women like this. So it’s no surprise that guys dismiss and disrespect those types. No one should expect, and certainly not *demand* otherwise. If you want to be treated fairly, you should treat others fairly. If you can’t, you shouldn’t complain when they don’t do what you can’t or won’t.

If you are “incapable of loyalty,” then you should not go around pretending to be, and leading people on in the belief that you are both capable and willing to remain loyal. You shouldn’t make promises you can’t keep… even if that is your only method of survival. To persist along these lines, only defeats feminine credibility. If we can’t trust you, then you “are not to be trusted.” And maybe i don’t speak for everyone, but i definitely don’t want to support someone who is incapable of being worthy of trust. I’ll be damned if i call a liar my equal. It’s not going to happen, regardless of which sexual organs you’re born with. Then again, i could call them superior to me, because they are able to manipulate others for the sole purpose of their own personal gains. Due to the nature of reality, i can’t help but envy that ability, even while i think it is utterly despicable. And both genders contain individuals who do such things. It just “seems” as though women tend to rely upon it more, and get caught and called out on it. Maybe women tend to underestimate and undervalue men who lack financial prowess, which leads to them making fools of themselves, thinking they won’t get caught. Who knows.

All i know is that most people don’t seem interested in generalized fairness, but rather are more interested in personal gains at any cost of detriment to others. That probably has something to do with the fact that there really isn’t enough of the good stuff to go around, and isn’t enough for everyone to have a nice life. So people fight over what’s available, and there are a relatively low number of winners.