I am not sure why the CSB report and video about ******** asphyxiation was deleted by moderators. Â It was simply general information about the dangers of ******** rich environments. Â It (the CSB bulletin) pointed out that unconsciousness can be reached in as little as one to two breaths and a state of coma in about forty seconds. Â The video recounted an incident where two people lost there lives in an accident at a plant that had been purged with ********. Â It, the video, through the use of recreation, showed just how quickly one succumbs to a ******** rich environment. Â General information is all it was. Â It is not a “technique” to jump into a five foot room on top of a reactor filled with ********. Â There were a few who whined because they don’t have the intelligence to understand the difference between a suicide technique and general safety information put out by a government safety agency. Â That is fine. Â This is not my site. Â However, my intention was to provide information to those contemplating a peaceful, fast, and easy exit from this existence that may comfort them while making the hardest decision that they will ever make.
Perhaps the moderators are sadistic people who simply wish to see only the posts of those suffering unbearable pain and get off on knowing that many will wind up suffering horrific deaths in the end. Â I do not know. Â However, I hope that everyone finds peace in any way that they can.
If anyone is considering asphyxiation with inert gases as their last resort, the report and video are easily found at the CSB website. Â Or you may contact me directly for links to the same information. Â And if you just like watching things “go to sleep” there are some videos out there showing asphyxiation of animals by inert gases. Â Even the BBC dedicated an entire series to the science of killing humans if anyone missed it. Â The conclusion for them, as well as many who have done a lot of research on their own, is that ******** asphyxiation is the best way to go.
Peace
6 comments
Its a judgemnt call of a moderator I’m sure, I’ve seen things gotten away with sharing about methods.
I wouldn’t take it personally, they just did what they thought best at the moment, and or decided it did cross there rule about methods.
Agreed. It is their judgement and their site. That is why I was a little shocked. It was simply factual information framed as a warning and information about the dangers of ******** rich environments by the source. Definitely not a technique of any sort….anyway…enough people have viewed it either way by this point…so mission accomplished. 😀
i guess they delated cause it broke the rules. And i guess it was about posting methods on here since ******** asphyxiation is a method
If simply mentioning ******** asphyxiation (actually hypoxia) is posting a “method”, then we wouldn’t be able to talk about anything at all, smoking cigarettes could be construed as a “method”, albeit a very slow one. 😀
I love SP, but I wish we could discuss methods here, since it’s a good way to separate the bull from the truth.
People make the best choices when they are well-informed. I hate to think of people hurting themselves further through botched suicide attempts.
But obviously, SP would be vulnerable to lawsuits if they allowed open discussion of methods.
I guess we just have to be greatful that the site is there at all.
SP would only be liable if it endorsed or presented itself as a source of “expert” or “suggested” methods of suicide. It is just a forum. (Semi) Anonymous people blathering on about anything on a forum could not possibly be construed as an endorsement or suggestion of what the posters say. They could even just place a simple disclaimer if they were worried about liability. Nah, they have another agenda, not a worry.
I do really like the site. A lot of different views and similar ideas, so both interesting and comfortably familiar at the same time. 😀