My disposition and inclination towards suicide fluctuates exceedingly. Some days I would like nothing more than to simply push a button to end my existence while other times I’m thankful I have the chance to perhaps change what is seemingly inevitable. (Note that I am not saying I’m thankful I haven’t killed myself) Innate survival instincts which are ingrained in our psyche convince us that there may be a way to overcome this futility in the future, no matter how significant the obstruction may be. The only thing that differentiates an average person with one who is mentally ill is that the latter is aware of this hope they possess and are conscious enough to overcome it if they truly desire. Hope is natural and lethal in many cases. Many people do not commit suicide because they fear agony in the process of their departure. I have heard people use this sentiment as a tool to minimize the problems of others by saying that if their problems were as critical as they claim they would not hesitate to execute themselves in a gruesome manner. I disagree quite profoundly, but it isn’t my job to convince or talk logic into the eyes of a judgmental fool. Thank you for posting
I don’t think “which is harder?” is even relevant. Obviously, sustained effort to remain healthy and avoid unnecessary suffering, is quite difficult… but also, overriding all the fear and psychological programming, to cause life-ending damage to oneself, is not exactly “easy,” for most people.
Suicide requires confronting all that from which most people actively shield themselves. Death typically carries a spike of a high degree of pain and extreme discomfort.
But living spreads that pain and suffering over a much longer time, while bringing spikes of its own.
Inviting that tsunami of a lifetime of pain, condensed into a few mere minutes, is no small feat. But neither is the endurance required to survive that same lifetime worth of pain, over the longest possible duration.
However, i think there’s a higher total of suffering, in a full-duration life, even if the degree of agony spikes much higher in the moment of an invited death. Death ends the requirements. Life remains subjected to them.
So, do you want to sprint? Or run a marathon?
Do you want to pour all your effort into covering the most distance in the least possible time?
Or do you want to reduce your rate of exertion, increase your duration of endurance, and cover as much distance as possible, in the maximum amount of time you are allowed to use?
I think one of the major issues is that people are taught and expected to sprint, when life is really more like a marathon. You can’t finish a marathon if you burn yourself out in the first couple miles.
…too often, i have been required to sprint, just to stay in the race. Now i can’t even come close to catching up, or even finding an acceptable pace; each further step is sheer agony. I cannot hope to finish this way.
What’s “harder,” is when you realize that none of the available choices are acceptable. I don’t particularly want to die… but i don’t see any viable option to make my life livable, since i’m already too exhausted to even survive… and don’t even have any way to gain anything from merely surviving, except more unbearable suffering, for no reason.
i was about killed in a manner close to mid-evil times execution. I crossed the line of pain. to the last second i refused to bush the “end” button. i don’t think to die or live is hard. I think making sound decisions i n hard.
On top of that, I was involved in airplane crash 3 years back, once again i refused to push the “off” button. So personally, until i figure out the meaning of life i do not care for an easy way out.
7 comments
If you honestly don’t know whether living or dying is harder, your life must not be very difficult.
Living requires far more and sustained effort. Therefore: living is harder.
My disposition and inclination towards suicide fluctuates exceedingly. Some days I would like nothing more than to simply push a button to end my existence while other times I’m thankful I have the chance to perhaps change what is seemingly inevitable. (Note that I am not saying I’m thankful I haven’t killed myself) Innate survival instincts which are ingrained in our psyche convince us that there may be a way to overcome this futility in the future, no matter how significant the obstruction may be. The only thing that differentiates an average person with one who is mentally ill is that the latter is aware of this hope they possess and are conscious enough to overcome it if they truly desire. Hope is natural and lethal in many cases. Many people do not commit suicide because they fear agony in the process of their departure. I have heard people use this sentiment as a tool to minimize the problems of others by saying that if their problems were as critical as they claim they would not hesitate to execute themselves in a gruesome manner. I disagree quite profoundly, but it isn’t my job to convince or talk logic into the eyes of a judgmental fool. Thank you for posting
I don’t think “which is harder?” is even relevant. Obviously, sustained effort to remain healthy and avoid unnecessary suffering, is quite difficult… but also, overriding all the fear and psychological programming, to cause life-ending damage to oneself, is not exactly “easy,” for most people.
Suicide requires confronting all that from which most people actively shield themselves. Death typically carries a spike of a high degree of pain and extreme discomfort.
But living spreads that pain and suffering over a much longer time, while bringing spikes of its own.
Inviting that tsunami of a lifetime of pain, condensed into a few mere minutes, is no small feat. But neither is the endurance required to survive that same lifetime worth of pain, over the longest possible duration.
However, i think there’s a higher total of suffering, in a full-duration life, even if the degree of agony spikes much higher in the moment of an invited death. Death ends the requirements. Life remains subjected to them.
So, do you want to sprint? Or run a marathon?
Do you want to pour all your effort into covering the most distance in the least possible time?
Or do you want to reduce your rate of exertion, increase your duration of endurance, and cover as much distance as possible, in the maximum amount of time you are allowed to use?
Which is more efficient?
I think one of the major issues is that people are taught and expected to sprint, when life is really more like a marathon. You can’t finish a marathon if you burn yourself out in the first couple miles.
…too often, i have been required to sprint, just to stay in the race. Now i can’t even come close to catching up, or even finding an acceptable pace; each further step is sheer agony. I cannot hope to finish this way.
What’s “harder,” is when you realize that none of the available choices are acceptable. I don’t particularly want to die… but i don’t see any viable option to make my life livable, since i’m already too exhausted to even survive… and don’t even have any way to gain anything from merely surviving, except more unbearable suffering, for no reason.
It’s tragically ridiculous.
Dear diesmart,
i was about killed in a manner close to mid-evil times execution. I crossed the line of pain. to the last second i refused to bush the “end” button. i don’t think to die or live is hard. I think making sound decisions i n hard.
On top of that, I was involved in airplane crash 3 years back, once again i refused to push the “off” button. So personally, until i figure out the meaning of life i do not care for an easy way out.
I liked your sprinting/marathon analogy. None of the available choices are acceptable, totally agree with that. It is tragically ridiculous.